·
Michael Jackson is a pop singer and performer
who is widely regarded as one of the most influential artists of the 20th
century
·
Andrew Goodwin is a theorist who has written extensively about the
conventions of pop music videos, and in accordance with his quantifiers, Michael
Jackson’s music videos can be considered mostly conventional
·
Primarily Jackson’s videos are performance and
concept based, with particular emphasis on dance choreography, for example “Bad”
(1987, directed by Martin Scorsese) hinges entirely around the star and his
group’s dance routine, their synchronicity and the spectacle that comes with it
·
·
His videos
generally rely more on mid shots than close ups, and while they service his
performance, they typically do not act as meat shots as the first person mode of
address is rarely used, and on the occasions when he does break the fourth wall
and address the viewer, it is not sustained, this being most evident in “They
Don’t Care About Us” (1996, directed by Spike Lee. “Black or White” (1991, directed by John
Landis) is less reliant on dance choreography and as such features more
midshots than most of Jackson’s other videos
·
Jackson’s dancing skill can almost be considered part of
recogniseable visual motifs in themselves, particularly some of his signature,
iconic dance moves. This is why close ups In his videos are essentially
replaced with midshots, because his dancing ability is invariably the focus,
and the latter shot size accomodates his dancing talent and facial performance.
·
On the whole his videos are strongly
voyeuristic, he is present in almost every shot and is typically the focus, but
they are not fetishistic as Jackson is not particualrly sexualised
·
Although some of Jackson’s videos do feature intertextual references,
such as the werewolf transformation in “Thriller”, which is a reference to “An
American Werewolf in London” and Macaulay Culkin starring in the intro to
“Black or White” in an obvious “Home Alone” reference, these are not the focus
of the video
·
Richard Dyer is another theorist who has studied
pop music videos and written extensively the creation of the star image in his
books “Stars” (1979) and “Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society” (1986)
·
·
·
Much emphasis is placed on the illusion that Jackson is both ordinary
and extraordinary, in that typically the basic premises for his videos both normalise
him, “Bad” is simply Jackson and his group dancing around an empty parking lot,
but it’s his dancing talent and the synchronicity between him and his group
that make him seem extraordinary. In this sense his extraordinary qualities do
not seem artificial created through some kind of hypothetical scenario, Michael
Jackson is performing the dances himself and manifests his extraordinary
qualities
·
·
Thriller is the video in which Jackson is most
evidently present and absent, his “absence” being created by the mystery
surrounding his transformations into a werewolf and a zombie – he is and isn’t
the recognisable star
·
In regards to the star image of the artist has
changed, Michael Jackson has consistently been presented as opposing authority,
preventing the effect of “second album syndrome”, but a sense of evolution is
created from how his persona has shifted from outright rebellion in “Bad” to
fighting injustice, in both “Black or White”, and “They Don’t Care About Us”
·
·
The first stage is relatively clear (if the mock
horror film opening is excluded), the stable equilibrium being Jackson walking
home with his girlfriend, presumably towards safety
·
Disequilibrium is created as part of stage two by the zombies
awakening from the graveyard and pursuing the pair
·
Most conventional of horror narratives is that
in stage three of Todorov’s structure the recognition of the disruption does
not happen until it is too late for proper action to be taken against it - the
couple are already encircled and trapped by the undead
·
·
·
Talking Heads are an alternative funk rock band
and generally have unconventional music videos according to Goodwin’s theory
·
·
By contrast, there is typically a tight
relationship between the lyrics and visuals, the funk rock styling of the band
lending itself very well to absurdist and surreal imagery of their videos and
the editing is very much dictated by the rhythm of the song
·
Close ups do feature fairly frequently in the group’s videos,
although they are typically delivered in much more abstract means then would
typically be expected from a more mainstream artist. “Once in a Lifetime” sees
the artist kneel and lower his head to the floor, before twisting it towards
the camera as it zooms in, bringing him into a unusual close up. This is also compounded by
a first person mode of address with the character breaking the fourth wall by
looking down the lens of the camera which makes the videos surprisingly
conventional in this sense

·
·
The notion of looking is often present, but because there is
not often an established look for the lead singer and his appearance is almost
rarely the focus, it is hard to argue it makes the video more conventional
·
Some of the band’s music videos are voyeuristic, particularly
“Once in a Lifetime” where the performance is the focus of the video, but it is
never fetishistic. Videos like “And she was” on the other hand are not
voyeuristic at all and focus on the concept of the video
·
Being more alternative as a group, Talking Heads
are far less concerned with star image music videos for an icon such as Michael
Jackson
·
The primary conventional star quality the Talking Heads exhibit is
their originality, and this is very clearly reflected in the diversity in the styles
of their music videos and the content therein. “Once in a Lifetime” has a
distorted post production effect added to make it look faintly like the video
is corrupted, along with backgrounds saturated with peculiar psychedelic
patterns. “And She Was” has a hand crafted look to it, as if it were animated
using stop-motion and as if each component has been cut out of paper
·
·
There is a considerable level of incoherence to
the Talking Heads’ image, but it is so inconsistent and enigmatic that it lacks
the sense that it is can be completed at all, unlike Michael Jackson. They do
change styles in a similar way to Jackson, but there is little continuity
between their videos. Generally their image is fairly sporadic and there is
little sense of evolution, unlike Jackson
·
While Talking Heads do possess some qualities
related to the creation of a star image, as an alternative band it does not
need to be as much of a focus as it does for Jackson, who as a mainstream act, needs to be commodified
·
It is difficult to approach the Talking Heads’
videos from a narrative perspective because typically there is little
continuity between the visuals used. One of the few videos they have that does
have a vague narrative is “And She Was”
·
The narrative is very abstract but it uses a
variety of signifiers to allude to some form of plot taking place and is best
analysed in relation to the theories of Bordwell and Thompson, particularly
Bordwell’s ideas of semantics of narrative
·
The fabula is essentially described in the
lyrics, telling the story of a female character-“She”-who has an existential
experience while lying on the grass, starting with the object around her (shown
through a vertical pan across the ground) before going on to broader ideas as
the camera drifts into the sky. Research suggests the song refers to a girl the
band once knew who used to take LSD behind a factory
·
·
In comparison with Jackson’s “Thriller” which
follows a far more conventional narrative, it is incredibly difficult to break
the Talking Heads’ video down to Todorov’s theory in relation to any kind of
equilibrium because the premise is so unique and plot relatively simplistic
·
The Talking Heads, as an alternative band, are
able to utilise more questionable premises for their videos and have a far more
abstract syuzhet because they can risk alienating certain viewers who may not
understand what is going on, unlike Jackson, who needs as wide appeal as
possible






Outstanding analysis - original, perceptive and clearly Level 4 in its use of theory.
ReplyDelete